StackAmplify

Cursor vs Windsurf

A side-by-side of Cursor and Windsurf on pricing and our methodology scores, drawn from each tool's category Listings. They compete in AI Coding Assistants.

Our pick
Cursor logo

Cursor

from $20/mo

AI-native code editor with multi-file Composer and fast autocomplete.

Visit Cursor

The verdict

Cursor is the stronger overall pick. In the AI Coding Assistants ranking it scores 4.13 to Windsurf's 3.70 out of 5. That said, Windsurf wins on individual criteria below, so read the breakdown against your own priorities.

At a glance

Cursor Windsurf
Starting price $20/mo $20/mo
Free tier Yes Yes
AI Coding Assistants score 4.13 (#1) 3.70 (#2)

Head to head: AI Coding Assistants

scored / 5
Code Completion 25% weight
Cursor 4.5

Reviewers call Tab the feature that hooks them: speed and accuracy described as telepathic, predicting whole edits rather than single lines and running about twice as fast as Copilot.

Windsurf 3.0

Sentiment splits hard: Supercomplete predicts intent and writes context-fitted functions, but developers rate raw completion below Cursor and say it mainly improves after indexing.

Agentic Editing 25% weight
Cursor 4.0

Composer is the standout for multi-file work, diffing a codebase-wide rename across 15+ files cleanly, though some reviewers report misplaced code and unreliable cross-file changes in tougher contexts.

Windsurf 4.5

Cascade is the feature reviewers single out as the real strength, automating about 90% of generate-and-debug with visible reasoning and parallel flows across a codebase.

Codebase Context 20% weight
Cursor 4.0

Whole-repo indexing of functions, types, and dependencies is repeatedly called the killer feature, but context gets forgetful after breaks and degrades on large or long-running projects.

Windsurf 3.5

Whole-repo indexing earns a comparison win for deep project awareness, but the agent gathers only 100 to 200 lines at a time and trips on files past roughly 800 lines.

Model Flexibility 15% weight
Cursor 4.5

Consistently rated a strength: per-chat or per-session choice across Claude, GPT, o1, Gemini, and Cursor's own model, with bring-your-own-key, compared favorably to Copilot's single-model approach.

Windsurf 3.0

The criterion reviewers most often call a relative weakness: less choice than Cursor and no smooth mid-session swapping, though frontier and open-source models do show up on paid tiers.

Value for Money 15% weight
Cursor 3.5

Reviewers call the $20/month plan worth it for daily developers, but the move to usage-based credits roughly halved effective monthly requests and drew complaints about surprise overages.

Windsurf 4.5

Most cited strength: a free tier reviewers call genuinely usable and a Pro price that undercuts Cursor, with the caveat that heavy agent-mode use can burn credits fast.

Cursor

Pros

  • Tab autocomplete predicts the next edit, not just the next line, and reviewers clock it around 2x faster than Copilot
  • Composer handles 15+ file refactors autonomously, turning a codebase-wide API rename into a single reviewable diff
  • Whole-project indexing of functions, types, patterns, and dependencies that a single-file plugin cannot match
  • Per-chat model choice across Claude, GPT, o1, Gemini, and Cursor's own model, with bring-your-own-key

Cons

  • Agentic edits can misplace generated code and get unreliable in harder cross-file scenarios, so you still review every diff
  • Context degrades on large or long-running projects and gets forgetful after a break
  • The shift to usage-based credits roughly halved effective monthly requests and caught reviewers with surprise overages

Windsurf

Pros

  • Cascade is the standout: reviewers describe it automating roughly 90% of generate-and-debug through an approve, run, iterate loop
  • Shows its reasoning as it works instead of hiding it in a black box, which makes agent runs easier to trust
  • Runs multiple agentic flows in parallel across different parts of a codebase
  • Free tier is a genuinely usable product for moderate daily coding, not a teaser with artificial limits
  • Lower Pro entry price than Cursor at $15 to $20 a month

Cons

  • Raw inline completion lags Cursor, with developers calling the gap "night and day" and noting it only sharpens after indexing
  • Less model choice than Cursor, and no easy mid-session model swapping
  • Agent struggles with files over roughly 800 lines and pulls context 100 to 200 lines at a time, which causes some bad edits
  • Agent-mode credit usage can run more expensive than Cursor once you push it hard

FAQ

Is Cursor or Windsurf better?
Cursor edges ahead in our scoring. In the AI Coding Assistants ranking Cursor scores 4.13 and Windsurf scores 3.70 out of 5. Windsurf still wins on specific criteria, so the right pick depends on what you weight most.
Is Cursor cheaper than Windsurf?
Cursor starts at $20/mo and Windsurf starts at $20/mo. Total cost depends on seats and the tier you land on, so compare the plans that match your usage.
What is the difference between Cursor and Windsurf?
Cursor is positioned as AI-native code editor with multi-file Composer and fast autocomplete. Windsurf is positioned as Agentic AI IDE built around autonomous multi-file workflows. They go head to head in AI Coding Assistants.
Read the full Cursor review → Read the full Windsurf review →

StackAmplify may earn an affiliate commission from purchases made through links on this page. This does not influence the scores, which are computed from each category's published methodology.