Fireflies.ai
from $10/mo
AI notetaker and searchable meeting knowledge base for teams.
Visit Fireflies.aiFireflies.ai vs Granola
A side-by-side of Fireflies.ai and Granola on pricing and our methodology scores, drawn from each tool's category Listings. They compete in Best AI Meeting Notes.
Granola
from $14/mo
AI meeting notes that work without a bot, built for founders and PMs.
Visit GranolaThe verdict
Granola is the stronger overall pick. In the Best AI Meeting Notes ranking it scores 3.83 to Fireflies.ai's 3.38 out of 5. That said, Fireflies.ai wins on individual criteria below, so read the breakdown against your own priorities.
At a glance
| Fireflies.ai | Granola | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $10/mo | $14/mo |
| Free tier | Yes | Yes |
| Best AI Meeting Notes score | 3.38 (#4) | 3.83 (#2) |
Head to head: Best AI Meeting Notes
scored / 5 Transcription Accuracy 25% weight
Fireflies.ai 3.5
Reviewers and independent testers cite roughly 90–95% accuracy on clear audio, but the most repeated complaint is that accuracy slips badly with heavy accents, background noise, and people talking over each other.
Granola 3.5
Strong on clean one-on-one audio at around 90–95%, but transcripts ship without speaker labels and accuracy drops on three-plus-person calls and long-form interviews.
AI Summary Quality 25% weight
Fireflies.ai 3.5
Summaries with timestamps and action items get praised as productivity wins, but independent reviewers flag inconsistency — recaps can flatten nuanced conversations and action-item attribution is unreliable, sometimes naming the wrong owner or inventing tasks.
Granola 4.5
Enhance Notes is the most-praised feature in the category — it elaborates on your own bullets instead of producing transcript-shaped boilerplate, and the output holds up across languages.
Integrations 20% weight
Fireflies.ai 4.0
The clearest strength here — Fireflies shows up across every major meeting platform and pushes notes into CRMs cleanly enough to save reviewers 10–15 minutes of data entry per call, though native CRM depth is shallow and Slack Huddles and Webex coverage is incomplete.
Granola 3.5
Native Slack, Notion, HubSpot, Attio, and Affinity plus Zapier and MCP cover founder and PM workflows well; sales-team CRM automation feels light compared to Fireflies or Fathom.
Privacy and Security 15% weight
Fireflies.ai 2.5
Certifications are solid (SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, HIPAA) and data is encrypted in transit and at rest, but all audio uploads to the cloud, the privacy policy permits marketing use and third-party sharing, and a December 2025 class-action lawsuit alleges biometric data collection without consent — an allegation, not a ruling, but a real gap between certified and private for regulated teams.
Granola 4.0
Device-audio capture, discarded raw audio, and SOC 2 Type 2 are real structural wins, but the model-training opt-out is per-seat below Enterprise and participants are never auto-notified that transcription is on.
Value for Money 15% weight
Fireflies.ai 3.0
Independent reviewers call the $10 Pro tier reasonably priced and competitive, but value is the single most contested theme on review sites — around 40% of negative reviews cite high cost and confusing billing, and some find paid tiers expensive next to rival transcription tools.
Granola 3.5
The $14/seat Business plan is fairly priced for the feature set, but the 'free tier' is closer to a 25-meeting trial than an ongoing free plan, so practical value lives on the paid tier.
Fireflies.ai
Pros
- CRM and cross-platform integrations are the standout — reviewers report saving 10–15 minutes of manual data entry per meeting
- Shows up regardless of meeting platform, so Zoom, Meet, and Teams calls all land in one searchable place
- AskFred lets you query past meetings in plain language across single or multiple calls
- 100+ integrations span Salesforce, HubSpot, Slack, Notion, Linear, and Zapier for custom workflows
- $10 Pro tier is competitive and the free-forever plan lets a team try it without a card
Cons
- Native CRM depth is shallow — one Pipedrive user calls the integration "limited" despite the long connector list
- Action-item attribution is unreliable, sometimes assigning the wrong owner or inventing tasks from casual remarks
- All audio uploads to Fireflies' cloud, and the privacy policy permits data use for marketing and third-party sharing
- A December 2025 class-action lawsuit alleges biometric data collection without consent
- Value is the most contested theme on review sites — roughly 40% of negative reviews cite high cost and confusing billing
Granola
Pros
- Bot-free capture keeps recruiting, fundraising, and customer calls candid
- Enhance Notes elaborates on what you actually typed instead of dumping a transcript
- Transcription holds 90–95% on clean one-on-one audio in independent tests
- Summary quality holds up in non-English meetings
- Native Slack, Notion, HubSpot, Attio, and Affinity covers the standard founder stack
Cons
- Transcripts have no speaker labels, so three-plus-person calls get muddled
- Free tier is effectively a 25-meeting trial, not an ongoing free plan
- Model-training opt-out is per-seat unless you pay for Enterprise
- No Android app — phone-side workflows are iPhone only
- Long-form interview accuracy is uneven on accents and proper names
FAQ
- Is Fireflies.ai or Granola better?
- Granola edges ahead in our scoring. In the Best AI Meeting Notes ranking Fireflies.ai scores 3.83 and Granola scores 3.38 out of 5. Fireflies.ai still wins on specific criteria, so the right pick depends on what you weight most.
- Is Fireflies.ai cheaper than Granola?
- Fireflies.ai has the lower entry price: Fireflies.ai starts at $10/mo and Granola starts at $14/mo.
- What is the difference between Fireflies.ai and Granola?
- Fireflies.ai is positioned as AI notetaker and searchable meeting knowledge base for teams. Granola is positioned as AI meeting notes that work without a bot, built for founders and PMs. They go head to head in Best AI Meeting Notes.
StackAmplify may earn an affiliate commission from purchases made through links on this page. This does not influence the scores, which are computed from each category's published methodology.