Why send an async video instead of booking a meeting?

A short recorded walkthrough lets the other person watch on their own time and replay the tricky parts, which often replaces a live call entirely. It trades scheduling overhead for a few minutes of recording.

By James Bay · Updated Jun 20, 2026

Best Async Video & Screen Recording Software

The best async video and screen recording tools for work, ranked on recording, editing and AI, sharing and analytics, integrations, and value.

Our picks

Also Great 4.0

Loom

The default async recorder when sharing and viewer analytics matter more than polished editing.

Visit Loom Why it won

Also Great 3.5

Vidyard

The async video pick for sales teams who live in their CRM and treat viewer analytics as the whole point.

Visit Vidyard Why it won

Async video tools let you record your screen and camera and share a link, replacing meetings and long threads with a quick walkthrough. This guide ranks the leading options against the criteria below.

How we evaluated

Recording Experience 25%

How easily you capture screen, camera, and audio, and the quality of the result.
Editing & AI 25%

Trimming, filler-word removal, transcripts, summaries, and other AI cleanup features.
Sharing & Engagement 20%

Instant share links, embedding, and viewer analytics that show who watched what.
Integrations 15%

Connections to Slack, CRM, help desks, and the tools where videos get shared.
Value for Money 15%

Pricing and recording limits against the capability delivered.

The ranked list

Loom

The default async recorder when sharing and viewer analytics matter more than polished editing.

4.00

score / 5

Pros

Three-click capture and instant record-to-share with no rendering wait
Analytics show who opened a video, how far they watched, and where they dropped off
Comment and emoji reactions let viewers respond without booking a call
Post-Atlassian integrations record from a Jira issue or build Confluence notes in one click
Chrome extension fits cleanly into an existing workflow

Cons

Manual editing is bare-bones, with no timeline and no mid-video rearranging
A misspoken line means re-record or live with it
The best AI cleanup sits behind the Business plus AI tier at 24 dollars per user
Laggy recording and slow uploads have persisted since the Atlassian migration
The free tier caps at 5 minutes, 25 videos, and 720p, limits teams hit fast

Score breakdown

Recording Experience 25% 4.0

Rated the fastest and easiest capture in the category, though laggy recording, slow uploads, and a camera bubble locked to a fixed corner pull it back.
Editing & AI 25% 3.5

Manual editing is bare-bones with no timeline, but the AI filler-word removal, summaries, titles, and chapters are real time-savers on longer recordings.
Sharing & Engagement 20% 5.0

The standout strength: instant links plus analytics that reveal exactly who watched what and where they dropped off, beyond the view counts most rivals give.
Integrations 15% 4.5

A seamless Chrome extension plus first-class Jira, Confluence, Slack, Salesforce, Gmail, and Zendesk connections after the Atlassian acquisition.
Value for Money 15% 3.0

Speed earns praise, but rising prices, paywalled features, a restrictive free tier, and overlap with Zoom or Slack leave value sentiment mixed.

Visit Loom Read review

Vidyard

The async video pick for sales teams who live in their CRM and treat viewer analytics as the whole point.

3.50

score / 5

Pros

Chrome extension captures screen and webcam in under 30 seconds with no editing step
Named viewer analytics show exactly who watched, how long, and where they dropped off
Deep native connections to HubSpot, Salesforce, Salesloft, Outreach, and Apollo let reps record and send without leaving their sales tools
Engagement data syncs straight to the contact record for intentional follow-up
Desktop app handles longer recordings up to 4K when you want polished output

Cons

The Chrome extension is reported crashing mid-recording or failing to capture audio
Editing is limited to trimming and splitting, with no filler-word removal, smart zoom, or transitions
CRM sync is locked to the Teams plan, so cheaper tiers leave video engagement siloed
At roughly 59 to 99 dollars per user per month, a 25-seat team lands near 30,000 dollars a year
The free plan caps you at 5 videos a month

Score breakdown

Recording Experience 25% 3.5

Capture is fast and frictionless from a browser tab, and the desktop app handles up to 4K, but reviewers repeatedly hit the extension crashing or dropping audio mid-recording.
Editing & AI 25% 3.0

The editor only trims and splits, pushing people toward a second tool, while the AI leans into sales-style avatars and script generation rather than cleanup, with avatar quality that varies.
Sharing & Engagement 20% 4.5

Viewer analytics is the feature reviewers rate highest, with named tracking and drop-off heatmaps, dinged only by occasional link-load failures and richer analytics sitting behind paid tiers.
Integrations 15% 4.0

Native connections across the major CRM and sales tools are a consistent strength, though full CRM sync only unlocks on the Teams plan.
Value for Money 15% 2.5

The free tier is good for evaluating and the base price reads as competitive, but the 5-video cap and the jump to 59 to 99 dollars per seat draw repeated expensive-for-what-it-does criticism.

Visit Vidyard Read review

FAQ

Why send an async video instead of booking a meeting?: A short recorded walkthrough lets the other person watch on their own time and replay the tricky parts, which often replaces a live call entirely. It trades scheduling overhead for a few minutes of recording.

StackAmplify may earn an affiliate commission from purchases made through links on this page. This does not influence rankings, which are computed from the methodology above.