Loom
from $18/mo
The standard async screen and video recorder for work, now with AI editing.
Visit LoomLoom vs Vidyard
A side-by-side of Loom and Vidyard on pricing and our methodology scores, drawn from each tool's category Listings. They compete in Async Video Software.
Vidyard
from Free
Async video recording and hosting built for sales and marketing teams.
Visit VidyardThe verdict
Loom is the stronger overall pick. In the Async Video Software ranking it scores 4.00 to Vidyard's 3.50 out of 5. That said, Vidyard wins on individual criteria below, so read the breakdown against your own priorities.
At a glance
| Loom | Vidyard | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $18/mo | Free |
| Free tier | Yes | Yes |
| Async Video Software score | 4.00 (#1) | 3.50 (#2) |
Head to head: Async Video Software
scored / 5 Recording Experience 25% weight
Loom 4.0
Rated the fastest and easiest capture in the category, though laggy recording, slow uploads, and a camera bubble locked to a fixed corner pull it back.
Vidyard 3.5
Capture is fast and frictionless from a browser tab, and the desktop app handles up to 4K, but reviewers repeatedly hit the extension crashing or dropping audio mid-recording.
Editing & AI 25% weight
Loom 3.5
Manual editing is bare-bones with no timeline, but the AI filler-word removal, summaries, titles, and chapters are real time-savers on longer recordings.
Vidyard 3.0
The editor only trims and splits, pushing people toward a second tool, while the AI leans into sales-style avatars and script generation rather than cleanup, with avatar quality that varies.
Sharing & Engagement 20% weight
Loom 5.0
The standout strength: instant links plus analytics that reveal exactly who watched what and where they dropped off, beyond the view counts most rivals give.
Vidyard 4.5
Viewer analytics is the feature reviewers rate highest, with named tracking and drop-off heatmaps, dinged only by occasional link-load failures and richer analytics sitting behind paid tiers.
Integrations 15% weight
Loom 4.5
A seamless Chrome extension plus first-class Jira, Confluence, Slack, Salesforce, Gmail, and Zendesk connections after the Atlassian acquisition.
Vidyard 4.0
Native connections across the major CRM and sales tools are a consistent strength, though full CRM sync only unlocks on the Teams plan.
Value for Money 15% weight
Loom 3.0
Speed earns praise, but rising prices, paywalled features, a restrictive free tier, and overlap with Zoom or Slack leave value sentiment mixed.
Vidyard 2.5
The free tier is good for evaluating and the base price reads as competitive, but the 5-video cap and the jump to 59 to 99 dollars per seat draw repeated expensive-for-what-it-does criticism.
Loom
Pros
- Three-click capture and instant record-to-share with no rendering wait
- Analytics show who opened a video, how far they watched, and where they dropped off
- Comment and emoji reactions let viewers respond without booking a call
- Post-Atlassian integrations record from a Jira issue or build Confluence notes in one click
- Chrome extension fits cleanly into an existing workflow
Cons
- Manual editing is bare-bones, with no timeline and no mid-video rearranging
- A misspoken line means re-record or live with it
- The best AI cleanup sits behind the Business plus AI tier at 24 dollars per user
- Laggy recording and slow uploads have persisted since the Atlassian migration
- The free tier caps at 5 minutes, 25 videos, and 720p, limits teams hit fast
Vidyard
Pros
- Chrome extension captures screen and webcam in under 30 seconds with no editing step
- Named viewer analytics show exactly who watched, how long, and where they dropped off
- Deep native connections to HubSpot, Salesforce, Salesloft, Outreach, and Apollo let reps record and send without leaving their sales tools
- Engagement data syncs straight to the contact record for intentional follow-up
- Desktop app handles longer recordings up to 4K when you want polished output
Cons
- The Chrome extension is reported crashing mid-recording or failing to capture audio
- Editing is limited to trimming and splitting, with no filler-word removal, smart zoom, or transitions
- CRM sync is locked to the Teams plan, so cheaper tiers leave video engagement siloed
- At roughly 59 to 99 dollars per user per month, a 25-seat team lands near 30,000 dollars a year
- The free plan caps you at 5 videos a month
FAQ
- Is Loom or Vidyard better?
- Loom edges ahead in our scoring. In the Async Video Software ranking Loom scores 4.00 and Vidyard scores 3.50 out of 5. Vidyard still wins on specific criteria, so the right pick depends on what you weight most.
- Is Loom cheaper than Vidyard?
- Vidyard has the lower entry price: Loom starts at $18/mo and Vidyard starts at Free.
- What is the difference between Loom and Vidyard?
- Loom is positioned as The standard async screen and video recorder for work, now with AI editing. Vidyard is positioned as Async video recording and hosting built for sales and marketing teams. They go head to head in Async Video Software.
StackAmplify may earn an affiliate commission from purchases made through links on this page. This does not influence the scores, which are computed from each category's published methodology.